SELF-EVIDENT TRUTHS
I. WE THE PEOPLE AND OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS ARE SOVEREIGN TO MAN-MADE CODES, GOVERNMENT SERVANTS AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
- The Self-Evident Sovereignty of We the People& our Unalienable Rights to any man-made Government Entity & Government Codes, Statutes and Rules falsely portrayed as “Laws” is the very essence of humanity.
- Any man-made code that contradicts Sovereign Natural Law or deprives our Unalienable Rights is not a “law” at all – it is invalid & void on its face.
- Our Unalienable Rights are bountiful & boundless.
- These fundamental doctrines are founded on universal doctrines of truth, justice, order, reason, consistency & is unchangeable, eternal, commonsense doctrines of morality, respect for human as affirmed throughout history.
These Self-Evident Truths are the foundation of mankind since the beginning of time:
| Timeline | Document/Affirmation | Self-Evident Sovereignty of We the People |
| 1st century B.C | Cicero, Roman philosopher, statesman & lawyer affirms the sovereignty of We the People and our Unalienable Rights as auniversal moral law inherent in nature & reason, applicable to all times & nations not subject to change by any other law. | “There is a true law, a right reason, conformable to nature, universal, unchangeable, eternal. This law cannot be contradicted by any other law & is not liable to derogation or abrogation. Neither the senate nor the people can give us any dispensation for not obeying this universal law of justice. It is not one thing at Rome & another at Athens; one thing today & another tomorrow; but in all times & nations, this universal law must forever reign, eternal & unperishable. He who obeys it not, flies from himself & does violence to the very nature of man.” |
| 1215 | Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for “Great Charter of Freedoms”), commonly called Magna Carta | Magna Carta, charter of English liberties granted by King John on June 15, 1215, under threat of civil war and reissued, with alterations, in 1216, 1217, and 1225. By declaring the sovereign to be subject to the rule of law and documenting the liberties held by “free men,” the Magna Carta provided the foundation for individual rights in Anglo-American jurisprudence. |
| 1776 | Our Charter The Declaration of Independence | “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—-That to SECURE these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…” |
| 1787 | Article I, Sec 8 of the man-made Constitution | Specifically restricts the power of public servants prohibiting them from legislating, regulating or devising “codes” to control our Unalienable Rights |
| 18th century | William Blackstone, 18th century Common Law English jurist & judge in Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1:93. | “Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.” |
| 1948 | U.N. International Declaration of Human Rights | 1. Far beyond affirming our Unalienable Rights as “endowed by the creator” in the Declaration of Independence, created in a time of abject slavery solely by white men, most who were slave owners, the U.N. Universal Declaration affirms our Unalienable Rights as inherent by our Human Dignity. 2. Moreover, far beyond the measly 3 enumerated therein, the U.N. Declaration affirms the self-evident truth of our boundless Unalienable Rights, specifically articulating 30, including Parental & Familial Unalienable Rights. |
| 1776 to present | Self-authenticated man-made doctrines and affirmations by Corporate Shareholders registered with Dun & Bradstreet as “SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES” with D-U-N-S #s 161906136 and 111477469 and falsely portrayed as the “U.S. Supreme Court” | Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884), Justice Horace Gray: “There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the U.S..in this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it. All else is withheld.” Perry v. U.S. 294 U.S. 330 (1935) Chief Justice Hughes: “In the United States, sovereignty resides in the people.. the Congress cannot invoke sovereign power of the People to override their will as thus declared.”Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) Justice T. Stanley Matthews: “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law… While sovereign powers are delegated to the government, sovereignty itself remains with the people.” Marbury v Madison, 1 Cranch 137; every right, when withheld, must have a remedy.Self-evident sovereign law is deceptively characterized as a “dissent” when it exposes the lawless tirades by their treasonous corporate shareholders: Exposing the absurdities spewed in First National Bank v Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978) that “contributions to ballot initiate campaigns” by corporations are their “free speech rights,” William H. Rehnquist states corporations are “artificial” persons rather than “natural” persons and granting them the right to political expression could {in a ludicrous understatement} “pose special dangers in the political sphere.” So too, John Paul Stevens in a “dissent” to the treasonous nonsense in Citizens United stated the obvious: – “Corporations…are not themselves members of ‘We the People’ by whom and for whom our Constitution was established.” – “Congress can exercise no power by virtue of any supposed inherent sovereignty in the general government. – Indeed, it may be doubted whether the power can be correctly said to appertain to sovereignty in any proper sense, as an attribute of an independent political community. – The power to commit violence, perpetrate injustice, take private property by force without compensation to the owner, and compel the receipt of promises to pay in place of money, may be exercised, as it often has been, by irresponsible authority, but it cannot be considered as belonging to a government founded upon law. – But be that as it may, there is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States. – It is a government of delegated powers, supreme within its prescribed sphere, but powerless outside of it. – In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their constitution, intrusted to it; all else is withheld.” |
THE MAIN FUNCTION OF
LEGITIMATE, LAWFUL GOVERNMENT IS TO
PROTECT, DEFEND & ENFORCE
OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
This Self-Evident Truth is affirmed throughout history.
| 1632–1704 | John Locke who is among the most influential political philosophers of the modern period. | In the Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments. Locke is thus also important for his defense of the right of revolution. Locke also defends the principle of majority rule and the separation of legislative and executive powers. In the Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke denied that coercion should be used to bring people to (what the ruler believes is) the true religion and also denied that churches should have any coercive power over their members. Locke elaborated on these themes in his later political writings, such as the Second Letter on Toleration and Third Letter on Toleration. |
| 1776 | Our Charter The Declaration of Independence | “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—- That to SECURE these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…” |